czech
version (česká verze)
Summary Information and Conclusions
of International Conference
on Problems of Propagation of Social Economy
Prague, October 24 – 25, 2002
The International Conference on Problems
of Propagation of Social Economy was attended by more than
600 participants coming from all member countries of the
European Union, from the candidate countries and from several
countries of Africa and Asia. The composition of the Conference
attendees was very diverse. Most of them came as representatives
of the sectors of social economy, in particular from various
co-operative associations and federations. Strong was the
representation of foundations and non-profit organisations.
Representatives of businesses with participation of employees
(so-called participative establishments) were also present.
It can be said that all parts of the sector of social economy
were represented.
Also the academic community had a strong
representation because the Conference was attended by representatives
of many European universities where problems of social economy
are subject of theoretical works, instruction and research.
Most of all the representatives of universities associated
in the Pan-European network EMES were concerned in which
15 Western European universities are represented. The seminar
A1 that took place in during both conference days and focussed
its attention first of all upon the question of establishments
with social economy in the extended Europe was dedicated
to the theoretical basis of social economy.
The opening ceremony of the conference was
attended by the head of the government of the Czech Republic
Mr. Vladimír Špidla who delivered the prologue in which
he replied to the problems of social economy and promised
– in the name of the government of the Czech Republic –
to support the process of propagation of this form of business.
He accented in his speech among others that the Czech government
wants to break the barriers affecting perception of social
economy and to support propagation of its ideas in all levels
of the state administration and self-administration and
to promote institutionalisation of social economy by way
of changing our legislation. He also said that the government
wants to facilitate that persons with health or other social
handicaps can assert themselves in the society.
The Czech governmental administration was
represented also by the minister of agriculture Mr. Jaroslav
Palas and the first secretary of the Ministry of Labour
and Social Affairs (MPSV) Mr. P. Šimerka.
Only a small, in principle zero interest in
the conference was shown by representatives of the lawmaking
bodies of both chambers of the Parliament of the Czech Republic.
Despite the fact that the deputy and senator clubs of all
parliamentary parties were informed about the prepared venue
of the conference well in advance only one Deputy of the
Parliament of the Czech Republic applied for attendance
at the conference. It is a pity because one of the aims
of the conference was to make representatives of legislative
authorities of all candidate states and especially of the
host country well acquainted with the problems of social
economy. In fact, the representatives of legislative authorities
created one of the target groups of the conference.
The sector of social economy enjoys a considerable
support in both many EU countries and the bodies of the
European Commission. This has found reflection in the attendance
of representatives of governmental administrations not only
from the countries of the European Union but also from the
candidate states inclusive of the first deputy of the ministry
for economic development and commerce of the Russian Federation.
As for the representatives of the Community bodies there
were officers of the Board of Management „Business“, representatives
of the Regional Policy Committee, the Economic and Social
committee and of the European Parliament. The introductory
word on behalf of the European Union was delivered by its
ambassador to the Czech Republic Mr. Ramiro Cibrián who
interpreted the message sent to the Conference by Mr. Erkki
Likkanen, the commissioner of the European Commission for
Business and Information Technologies. In this way he accented
the importance attached to the Conference and to these problems
in general by the authorities of the Community. It should
be noted that his whole presentation accented the important
role of cooperatives as one of the pillars of the sector
of social economy. He remembered that the EC has been supporting
the development of social economy not only in its member
countries but also in the candidate states and that this
trend will be followed on.
Initially, the conference was prepared for
500 participants but the actual attendance was higher by
more than 20 percent. It was attended by approximately 650
persons from 33 countries (from 16 EU countries, 13 Central
European and Eastern European countries and 4 countries
outside Europe). However, one could see a striking unbalance
between the participants from the countries of the European
Union on the one hand and from the candidate countries on
the other hand. The sector of social economy of the European
Union was represented by a higher number. The strongest
representation came from the sectors of social economy of
Italy, France, Belgium, Spain and Sweden. Regarding the
candidate countries it was Poland from where the strongest
delegation was present.
The planned programme of the Conference was
realized completely and a brisk discussion heated up in
the course of all the seven seminars that took place in
the course of the two days. The same can be said about the
proceeding of the accompanying programme that was organized
in the building of the Senate of the Czech Republic for
representatives of the Community authorities and representatives
of national administrations responsible for social economy
in individual countries. The same applies to the meetings
of competent ministers that were organized by the minister
of labour and social affairs Mr. Zdeněk Škromach.
As a part of the programme of the Conference
also a supper was prepared for the participants of the Conference
in the auditorium of the Žofín Palace. The celebration evening
was opened by the welcome presented by the Deputy Mayor
of the capital city of Prague Mr. Otto Kerchner who received
the delegation of representatives of the sector of social
economy from various European countries on October 25 in
the social spaces of the Prague City Hall.
Conclusions of the Conference and individual
seminars
General conclusions of the Conference were
formulated at its close by the President of the Coordinating
Committee of European Cooperative Associations (CCACE) Mr.
Étienne Pflimlin, the conclusions of individual seminars
were formulated by their rapporteurs.
Regarding the general conclusions of the Conference
they do not represent the target of the Conference’s efforts
but they are considered the starting point for future activities
of the whole sector of social economy.
The Conference referred to such essential
questions as continuous development, social coherence, support
of employment, social dialogue, expansion of business and
instruments for the financing thereof, modernization of
social economy. The conference went from the idea that Europe
can and must create a model of a global change based on
a deep respect of the man, freedom of trade and solidarity
between generations as well as from the idea of a generous
and enlarged Europe. A number of countries will adjoin this
political, economic and social groupment soon and others
will follow. We consider this enlargement a chance for both
the countries of the East and the West as well as for social
economy in both parts of Europe.
Europe is something more than a market. It
represents a model of a society that is looking for a balance
between competitive ability and solidarity. Cooperatives,
mutual insurance companies and foundations are important
components of this model. Their achievements are not measured
after their weight and performance covering a large area
but they are also measured after the principal appraisal
of their values and attained proportion in the satisfaction
of common interests.
Europe and in particular the Commission have
been supporting the spirit of business since a long time
actively as a basic element of continuous development as
well as the competitive ability and dynamics of the Union.
That is why businesses of social economy have their legitimacy,
their place and their role both in the East and in the West
and it is necessary to facilitate their actual progress
in the European structure for which they can and also must
provide a big contribution.
In this connection the Conference has formulated the following
four principles that are common for all categories of the
establishments of social economy:
1. Establishments of social economy have already been
inscribed in the given locality. They establish relations
with local authorities. They are, most often, who assures
economy in agricultural areas including the ones affected
by difficulties. All establishments of social economy are
the most important actors on the scene of the local and
regional development.
2. Establishments of social economy prefer
integration. They set as their goal to avert exclusion
of persons and, on the contrary, to facilitate integration
or protection of their members and employees, including
those most disadvantaged, without any form of discrimination.
Another goal is the support of solidarity. As they do not
exercise the policy of selection (of members, employees)
cooperatives succeed in reducing social risks. Besides that
these organisations bestow considerable financial means
for the education of their members and employees.
3. Intergenerational solidarity is
one of the attributes of establishments of social economy.
They build up indivisible reserves, organize social protection
based on mutuality of risks and sources. Non-profit character
and democratic management are common features of these systems.
They contribute to the construction of a social Europe by
way of their active participation in social and civic dialogue.
4. Functioning of establishments of social
economy approaches to the concept of social responsibility
and their values and practices are very close to what the
Commission wants to promote as the values that are defending
the European Union alone, i.e. the values tied to social
responsibility and continuous growth: participation
of employees and users, solidarity, personal development.
Rendering service to citizens within the frame of collective
approach is considered priority.
From the viewpoint of future activities
of the sector of social economy the Conference identified
several areas to which attention will have to be concentrated:
A – Execution of inventory and interchange
of the best practices among organisations of social economy
from the countries of Central and Eastern Europe and the
EU countries and contemplation on efficient activities:
e.g. by the creation of job opportunities to respond to
the needs of persons that were not satisfied by the market
or public administration, through education and employment
of excluded persons, through the strengthening of innovative
capacities and the search for concrete solutions by respecting
the principles of autonomy and solidarity.
B – Establishments of social economy
must actively contribute to the construction of a competitive
and powerful economy, to the creation of social coherence.
Vis-ŕ-vis to the effort of large supranational groupments,
establishments of social economy must build up alliances
and establish cooperation ties between the East and the
West in Central and Eastern Europe, in particular in the
area of information technology and communication and, at
the same time, put together coordinated networks in order
to achieve a higher efficiency.
C – Continuous growth in enlarged Europe
is also assured by the Community and national policies of
support of social economy. As a part of new approach
it is recommended to work out the programme of development
of social economy in the ten candidate states that could
stem from supranational experience of the SCOPE model and
that could also assure the opening of the PHARE programme
for the sector of social economy.
D – Necessity for financial instruments
is arising that are required for the formation and expansion
of businesses of social economy in the candidate states.
Partners ought to have the opportunity for finding them
in the framework of mutual securing funds, cooperative banks
and European financial institutions such as the European
Development Bank. Community programmes could help in the
transfer of competencies and the granting of guarantees
for basic capital or for operation funds.
E – It is necessary to see jointly
that the documents arise everywhere that will recognize
the existence of social economy and that a corresponding
legal framework is created in every country that would
protect different economic forms, freedom of organisation
of cooperative, mutual insurance institutions, associations
and foundations that render services. The possibility to
present the modernity and contrivance of organisations of
social economy was an important feature of the Conference.
Thus, it is necessary to convince the Convent – that
is engineering the reform of treaties with regard to the
process of extension and expectation of citizens – that
it should direct both the EU member countries and the candidate
states of EU extension to the real acknowledgement of the
contribution borne by our organisations to the Community
policies.
F – Improvement of national legislation
is considered a veritable priority. The prepared future
changes of the Community law in the area of competition
must prevent all those kinds of discrimination with the
definitive validity that are affronted by organisations
of social economy as these organisations still are not accepted
as an inevitable element of economic freedom in the stage
of increasing concentration. Owing to the process of globalisation
the development of commercial companies takes place to the
detriment of the establishments of social economy and it
is necessary to care that the principles of equilibrium
are established.
G – It is necessary to seek that social
economy is recognized as much as possible by both the governments
of European countries and by Community institutions.
It is also desirable to ensure, to the extent possible,
a wide exchange within the movement of social economy and,
naturally, the widest possible involvement of organisations
of social economy in the preparation of legislation directives
and regulations.
The President of the European Commission Mr.
Romano Prodi said that cooperatives „show clearly they
are able to make profit, to be innovative and competitive
and, at the same time, to pursue social aims and the general
character of requirements regarding the living environment“.
At its close the Conference enumerated all
coincident points that are common for the movements active
in the area of social economy and that represent, at the
same time, fundamental requirements for the improvement
regarding its recognition. The recognition is substantiated
owing to the role, aims and initiatives that correspond
to the targets of the Community and that support the realization
thereof.
- The extension is a chance for Europe
and the movement of social economy.
- By preparing reforms the European Convent must
preserve the European economic and social model.
- Recognition of freedom for business in all legal
forms.
- Acknowledgement of the role played by services of public
interest that are rendered just by organisations of
social economy.
- Participation of the movement of social economy
in official treaties both on the national and the
Community level.
- Support to the initiatives of young adherents of
social economy.
- Formation of a development fund for the establishments
of social economy in the countries of Central and Eastern
Europe. This fund could become a component of the supporting
programme of Community institutions.
- Adapted access of the candidate countries to structural
funds.
The Conference has proved that social economy
can contribute to the construction of Europe by providing
such values that are professed by the Union.
Besides the venue of two general sessions
the work of the Conference took its course in eight seminars
devoted to specific subjects that were coordinated by representatives
of diverse organisations of the sector of social economy.
Seminar A1
Formation of establishments of social economy in enlarged
Europe
Conclusions of the seminar:
The sector of social economy offers new high-quality
products, new methods of organisation of production and
distribution of goods and/or services, new relations among
production factors, it creates new market relations and
contributes to new legal forms of business. Business in
the area of social economy represents a dynamic answer to
the depressions of the market and the state that arose in
the course of the 19th century. It is also an answer to
the process of economic globalisation, it enables democratic
participation and management, transparency of information,
plurality of opinions and values and a strong social responsibility
towards the society and the environment.
In the course of the work of the seminar
several common features of organisations of the sector of
social economy in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe
were identified. First, hostile environment for the
progress of organisations of social economy and, somewhere,
a gradual development of cooperatives towards a better understanding
and acceptance from the part of public administration authorities.
Second, as far as cooperatives are concerned, it
seems that the method, that was used for the realization
of the privatisation process, discredited their image what
resulted in such situation that people ceased to take active
part in the work of the movement. Third, bodies of
national governments moved over from their humanitarian
and democratising goals to the search for „more durable“
aims and economic activities that can help them in improving
the living conditions in their countries.
The seminar cleared up the necessity of reintegration
and support to social aims as priorities in the framework
of every business area and the public sector; for instance,
cooperatives have not been included so far into the strategic
documents related to the national development in some countries.
Seminar A2
Progress of cooperative and participative business and social
partnership East-West. Model SCOPE.
Conclusions of the seminar:
The project SCOPE that was taken in the programme
PHARE – Programme of Business Support – was a project that
has set the target consisting in the creation and strengthening
of cooperative production organisations, social cooperatives
and establishments with participation in 10 candidate countries
of Central and Eastern Europe, in the support of the creation
of a network among them and the inclusion thereof into national
economies as a part of the dynamic process of European integration.
The project concentrated its activities into five basic
pillars that had to be respected by every engaged organisation
if it wanted to assure the viability of its system:
- Representativeness.
- Support of services for business.
- Development of human resources.
- Internal monitoring and self-assessment.
- Creation of complexes of knowledge and their further
use.
Overall results of the project implementation
can be summarized in the following points:
First: A new cooperative legislation
was brought into life in the three Baltic states, in other
countries new legislation motions were presented.
Second: Formal contacts to parliaments,
governments, ministries of labour and local administration
bodies were established in all candidate states.
Third: The project enabled the transfer
of experience published in several worked out studies on
the best policies.
Fourth: Considerable work was exerted
in the area of contacts with the European Commission of
which many documents were translated and disseminated. It
has to be noted that the project partners from the countries
of Central and Eastern Europe participated broadly in the
process of consultations and modifications of these documents.
Fifth: Partnerships arisen on the
level East-West and East-West were integrated into everyday
life to such extent that as good as everyday contacts between
partner organisations took place, viz. with the employment
of information technologies.
One of the results of the project is the fact that the project
laid steady foundations for the future project SCOPE 2 that
was approved by the European Commission in these days. It
should take its course in the years 2003 – 2004, thus it
will come to its end in the time when 8 of the 10 candidate
states already ought to be members of the European Union.
Seminar A3
Development of financing tools of social economy in the
candidate countries
Conclusions of the seminar:
In the course of the seminar work the following
operating procedures were presented that have to be implemented
in the next period of time.
- Proceed to the elaboration of the best policies
in the EU countries and in countries of Central and Eastern
Europe that could serve as an example for the candidate
countries. As well, a detailed study about tax and legislation
aspects of various financial institutions is to be worked
out.
- Pressure should be exerted with the aim that also cooperative
banks, credit unions and micro-financing institutions are
included in legislation on banks of the candidate countries.
- A working group is to be formed in which also deputies
of the European Commission will be represented and that
would see into the possibility of the development of financial
instruments of businesses of social economy on the basis
of those instruments that already exist.
- A joint (mutual) instrument is to be created for the financing
of establishments of social economy in countries of Central
and Eastern Europe. This instrument associating both existing
or subsequently established businesses could take the form
of a development fund that – depending upon individual cases,
needs and local legislation – would be used for the intervention
in the form of guarantees offered for operating funds or
basic capital.
Seminar A5
Social coherence, social integration and creation of jobs
Conclusions of the seminar:
The seminar remembered the three areas in
which social economy is operating: protection of persons
and property, social coherence and social integration. Further,
the seminar specified the areas where the policy of integration
can bring an active contribution:
- improvement of the employment rate over the whole population;
- development of new crafts adapted to persons excluded
from the traditional employment market;
- by supporting their creative forces individuals will be
afforded opportunity for the development of their own capacities.
The seminar accentuated:
- That it is necessary to involve various interested persons
with the aim to support employment and to alleviate social
and professional integration on local level.
- That social difficulties must be taken into consideration
that are affronted by excluded persons.
- That all cases of long-term (permanent) exclusion of persons
are to be listed.
- That capabilities (capacities) of persons are to be considered
that allow them to try their own hands at integration.
- That collaboration towards „mutualisation“ of sources
is developed.
During their work the participants of the
seminar identified themselves with the results of the meeting
in Lisbon according to which every country must present,
after every two years, their national plans comprising these
four goals:
- facilitation of access to employment;
- prevention of exclusion risks;
- help to the most vulnerable persons;
- mobilisation of all relevant authorities.
Therefore, it is necessary:
- To recognize social economy and to include the Charter
of fundamental rights in the future European Constitution.
To mobilize representatives of own countries in order that
they take into consideration the importance of the discussion
on problems of social policy.
- To look for strong partnerships with trade unions, local
associations to succeed in transferring the values of social
economy in various running negotiations.
- To remember that those who are taking decisions are governments
that are responsible for the social policy. Thus, the role
players of social economy must present their experience
to governments, in particular in the framework of nationwide
activities.
Seminar A6
Social dialogue, mutual and participative social security
Conclusions of the seminar:
In Europe as well as in the rest of the world,
social dialogue and the system of social protection are
found to be in a crisis that is the result of a complex
of economic, demographic and, naturally, also political
factors. The depth of this crisis caused mainly by the policy
of neo-liberal restriction of public expenditures and dismantling
of public services is measured by means of statistics of
unemployment, deterioration of conditions or equal access,
social exclusion, ….
Adequate legislative framework is necessary
for the defining of rules of social dialogue, conditions
of agreements and negotiations among partners and this framework
is identified by means of clear criteria of representativeness.
The framework has also to be created on European level and
social economy must find its place in it.
Regarding social protection the social dialogue
must have its goal consisting in the satisfaction of common
interests. Organisations of social economy, in particular
mutual insurance institutions, stand in opposition to the
spreading commercialisation of social protection which leads
inevitably to individualisation of responses to the existing
needs depending upon a higher or lower solvency of the requirements
in question. They create the possibility to preserve or
to create a solidarity complementary system based on mutual
acceptance of risks and creation of sources. These systems
may have various legal and organisational forms, country
by country. The only common feature of them is their non-profit
character and democratic management.
Organisations of social economy and trade
unions have the will to come out jointly against governments
in order to reach that public budgets devoted to social
protection are creating actual political and economic targets.
The requirement for a high-grade social protection is indivisible
from the protection of public services. Social economy and
trade unions must give their answer to the question of the
day: What should be social protection in a globalized world
and in the economy of finance systems that is trying to
cover everything by the coat of the only law, the law of
profit?
Seminar A7
Consistent local development and partnership between local/regional
administrations and social economy.
Conclusions of the seminar:
The work of this seminar lead in the formation
of the so-called Declaration of Prague that has become the
official document of the Conference on propagation of social
economy.
„DECLARATION OF PRAGUE“
drawn in connection with the 1st conference
on social economy held in Central and Eastern Europe on
October 24 and 25, 2002, in Prague.
In connection with the propagation of
social economy in the „old Europe“ a decisive historical
moment has come. This big challenge of democracy involves
millions of Europeans who are concerned both as participants
and citizens. To get it successful the European Convent
has to be built on the same basis (from above downward)
as well as the development of all local territories (upward).
The role players of social economy and local
and regional authorities whose representatives met in Prague
decided to sign the „Declaration of Prague“ that defines
their common tasks in the framework of local partnerships
and that presents a design of the development strategy on
all levels. It is expressing our commitment to reach the
improvement and the increase in the living standard of all
inhabitants of the European Union and of future member countries.
1. Task of social economy on local level
1.1 Organisations of social economy are basic instruments
used by local civil society for the solution of various
problems of economic and social nature.
1.2 Being players on the economic scene the organisations
of social economy are those who create local values, democracy
and employment.
1.3 Being players on economic scene the organisations of
social economy play a key role in the process of integration
of disadvantaged groups and in the creation and strengthening
of the so-called local social capital.
1.4 Social economy is recognized in a number of countries
as a key element of social coherence of territories.
2. Role of local and regional authorities
2.1 Elected local and regional deputies, whose primary task
is to response to the actual local needs, are considered
first information points for citizens.
2.2 Local and regional authorities are central players in
the life of the territory concerned from various viewpoints.
2.3 Local and regional authorities operate as catalysts
of economic activity and employment. Themselves, they are
employers, furnishers of local information and providers
of research, providers of services to all people in local
community. They are representatives of the community and
key players in local development and in regeneration of
partnerships.
2.4 Besides that, local and regional authorities of public
administration are responsible for the support given to
local standards in various areas including health care,
culture, employment, education and housing.
3.Contribution of partnership to local
development
3.1 Establishments of social economy are important partners
of local authorities within the framework of local development
strategies and in the creation of a new local pluralistic
prosperity. However, this does not avert the application
of the principle of „fair play“ from the part of local authorities
or businesses of traditional commercial sector on the one
hand and social economy on the other hand to compete in
the realisation of local development strategies in equitable
way. It is foremost social economy what can fill in the
space in providing social goods and those services that
are not provided by traditional businesses active on the
market or by the government.
3.2 Partnership between social economy, the private profit-making
sector and the public sector contributes to social coherence,
creation of social capital, participation, employment and
establishment of businesses on local level.
3.3 Partnership conveys value to the process of local development
and social progress by supporting relations based on confidence
and belief in society, participation of citizens and society;
by supporting higher social coherence it integrates people
outside society or at its edge (e.g. immigrants, people
unemployed for a long time).
3.4 Partnership can help in transforming the system of passive
social security and employee privilege allowances into active
social investment in sustainable development.
3.5 Partnership acts by way of mutual respect between partners,
downrightness and transparency and is based on a concrete
knowledge of local needs and potentials. Besides that the
principle of „global thinking and local acting“ is the condition
of a harmonic vision of development.
4. Building up stronger partnerships
Partnership between local and regional authorities on the
one hand and organisations of social economy from the EU
countries and from the candidate states should:
4.1 develop common strategies,
4.2 support propagation, confrontation of different methods
and exchange of the best policies in the form of presenting
specific directives in new European projects and thus to
facilitate the strengthening of the dialogue with the candidate
countries,
4.3 consolidate mutual links among various local partnerships
on regional, national and international level,
4.4 take actions to help in establishing new partnerships
between local authorities and social economy and thus to
propagate a model capable to connect the will of those who
are governing with the needs of citizens,
4.5 be considered professional centres and should be consulted
regarding all EU and national policies having impacts upon
the local level,
4.6 employ partnership as a standard element of „management
tool“,
4.7 be consulted, in particular through representative institutions,
organisations and mutual interconnection in the creation
of the new Europe,
4.8 play a clear role in the dissemination of Community
laws (aquis communautaires) on the lowest level.
5. European Union and national governmental
policies and sources
The European Union – in particular the European Commission
– and national governments are asked to recognize and support
this effort by implementing the actions of this Declaration
through the:
5.1 establishment of a database of the best
examples from the practice of social economy and local and
regional development;
5.2 creation of educational plans comprising economic and
social principles of local partnership and businesses of
social economy;
5.3 establishment of an inter-institutional working group
that would analyse the methods for the attainment of a higher
flexibility in Structural funds and that would pay special
attention to the support of territorial local development
based on partnership between social economy and local and
regional authorities;
5.4 organisation of regular European sessions for the purpose
of exchange of the best policies and mutual interconnection;
5.5 direction of a substantial part of EU finances, e.g.
the next round of financing EQUAL (2003-2006), to the exchange
of know-how about social economy, partnership and local
development and to the negotiations about European affairs
among local partners of EU and the countries aspiring after
accession;
5.6 support for a good visibility of successful local partnerships
in the form of an annual award for the best project/partnership
of social economy.
This initiative is a continuation of the
conclusions adopted by other European conferences on social
economy and the recent concept of the Regional Committee
on partnership between local and regional authorities and
organisations of social economy.
The Regional Committee and the REVES network
with its specific features and initial representative role
in a large number of territories may act as helpers in further
development of this process.
The present Declaration has been accepted
by the general session of the Conference on social economy
in Prague and has been concluded for the period of five
years. It will be monitored regularly for the purpose of
evaluation of the progress attained and facilitation of
further development both in practical and political domain.
* * *
Conclusions of the meeting
of SE ministers held on October 26, 2002, in the framework
of the programme of the International Conference on Problems
of Propagation of Social Economy
The conclusions of the meeting of ministers
were presented by the Luxemburgian minister Mr. François
Biltgen within the scope of the ministerial round table
organized in the course of the closing session of the Conference
on social economy.
The meeting of ministers charged with the
questions of social economy from the candidate and the member
countries of the EU has drawn the three fundamental conclusions:
- Social economy is a real phenomenon, however, it is
not founded on an exact legislative framework as no legally
exact definition of this phenomenon is existing so far.
Though this bears evidence of its copiousness and diversity
it makes its position more complicated at the same time.
- The course of the Conference demonstrated unambiguously
that there is much what the EU member countries on the
one hand and the candidate countries on the other hand
can learn from each other. Thus, it is not only the question
that the candidate countries should take over the collection
of acquis communitaires into their legislations but it
is evident that they also can enrich the environment in
the EU member countries with their experience significantly.
- Even though there is no exact legal definition of social
economy it is possible to agree upon three statements:
a) Social economy is not based on capital but upon participative
democracy.
b) The aim of social economy is not profit but mutual
solidarity.
c) Social economy may contribute, to a significant extent,
to integration of disadvantaged persons of various categories
into the society. *
On the basis of these conclusions and statements
the group of attendant ministers has formulated to requirements
specified here below:
A) We apply to the government of Greece, the
future President of the European Union, as well as to the
government of further countries that will take over the
role of presidency, to continue the tradition of these conferences
on social economy and the meetings of competent ministers
that are held in the framework thereof that ought to be
held every half year.
If a definition of social economy is to be
formulated it is necessary to integrate it into the complex
of European policies for which the Community bodies create
necessary standards. The role of social economy in the process
of integration of disadvantaged persons represents a very
important aspect.
B) European Commission must take up a very
practical approach to the problems of social economy and
look for ideas and subjects consistently for the support
of a broad collaboration between the member and the candidate
countries and, at the same time, for the support of collaboration
consisting in the creation of networks.
C) We apply to the European Parliament and
to the Council of Ministers with the requirement to create
adequate legal standards that will support and develop formation
of networks for cross-border collaboration.
* * *
Czech cooperative sector – one of the fundamental
pillars of the sector of social economy – identifies itself
both with the general conclusions of the Conference and
with the conclusions of individual seminars. In line with
them Cooperative Association of the Czech Republic, co-administrator
of the Prague Conference on propagation of social economy
considers the enforcement of the above cited conclusions
of the Conference to be its foreground tasks and,
during negotiations of its representatives with deputies
of state administration, with representatives of regional
administrations and with deputies of political representations
of all parliamentary parties, it will require the:
- support for creation of an adequate legislation framework
for the whole sector of social economy (institutionalisation
of social economy);
- acceptance of social economy as a prospect for the future;
- respecting of representatives of social economy and the
invitation of them to the talks on future exploitation of
the European Social Fund and of the structural funds of
the European Union after 2004.
Prague, November 2002
czech version
(česká verze)
sponsors
|